The apex of the Judeo-Christian worldview enshrines an immutable ontological order, expressed in Genesis: man, endowed with a rational and immortal soul (Imago Dei), exercises responsible dominion and stewardship over the material sphere. However, current geopolitical and scientific dynamics have radically subverted this paradigm, establishing a "deep" that does not pursue the administration of resources for the common human good, but rather seeks to free inanimate matter from the presence of rational humanity.

This neo-environmentalism, dogmatized from the economic forums of Davos and crystallized in the guidelines of the United Nations, operates structurally as a state pantheism. We witness the deification of "Mother Earth" (Pachamama), a regression to primitive animism, while the human being - primarily the conceived and the traditional family nucleus - is reduced to the category of epidemiological plague or negative "carbon footprint" variable. The old population Malthusianism has been clothed in simulated environmental devotion.

The capillary penetration of this sophistry in certain strata of ecclesial sociology represents an alarming theological anomaly. When the soteriological mandate (the salvation of souls) is displaced by the dogma of climate compensation and ecological hysteria, the Church renounces its eschatological function to become the moral certification agency of immanentist globalism.

Custody of the physical environment is a rational imperative, but it must be exercised without altering the hierarchy of the entity. The value of human life, possessed of intellect and will, infinitely exceeds that of any irrational material or biological aggregate. The integral progress of nations, deliberately suffocated by eco-coercive regulations from the global north, must prevail without concessions against the dogmatisms of an essentially misanthropic and pagan environmentalism.

Dr. María Victoria Ibáñez-Soto Doctor in Aristotelian-Thomistic Metaphysics. Specialist in Neuroscience, Quantum Physics and Ecclesiastical Philosophy.

Legal Note: This critical analysis is carried out under the protection of Art. 28 (news of general interest) and Art. 10 (right of citation) of Law 11,723 on Intellectual Property of the Argentine Republic. The original work and its title belong to its respective author and publication medium, cited on this page.