|Digital Edition — Year I, N° 1
Logo Santa Jacinta

Editorial Santa Jacinta

Fides • Traditio • Veritas
The Jerusalem Post · By Lic. Juan Pablo Torres-Lozano · Monday, July 13, 2026

Algorithmic warfare and the mechanization of conflict: The end of military ethics

The Jerusalem Post details the accelerated adoption of Artificial Intelligence systems for target identification and tactical decision making in recent military operations. The analysis highlights how machine learning algorithms process immense volumes of data to recommend bombings in a matter of seconds, dramatically reducing the role of human oversight. It is argued that this operational efficiency is essential to maintain strategic superiority in the asymmetric conflicts of the 21st century.

Algorithmic warfare and the mechanization of conflict: The end of military ethics

Of The Jerusalem Post

"The lethality of the modern battlefield demands a speed of response that surpasses human cognition. Integrating AI into the chain of command is not optional; Target selection algorithms ensure surgical precision that, paradoxically, minimizes collateral damage by optimizing destructive force."
Consult original note at The Jerusalem Post

Editorial rereading

The cold casualness with which The Jerusalem Post and various military analysts promote the automation of war constitutes an ethical aberration that threatens to completely dehumanize the most tragic act of civilization: armed conflict. Delegating the decision to take a human life to an artificial neural network is the ultimate expression of technocratic moral decadence, where the person is reduced to a simple pixel or statistical objective on a tactical screen. The classic doctrine of the Just War, painstakingly elaborated over the centuries by Christian thought, requires that any warlike action be strictly governed by the principles of proportionality, discrimination and, above all, the right intention of the human will. A mathematical algorithm ontologically lacks consciousness, empathy, and moral agency; He cannot feel compassion for a family trapped in a fire zone, nor can he exercise the prudence necessary to abort an attack when the situation on the ground suddenly changes. By mechanizing lethal decision-making, the moral responsibility of commanders is diluted, creating a legal and spiritual vacuum where mass homicide is justified under the pretext of an "algorithmic miscalculation." This supposed "surgical precision" promised by the arms industry is a fallacy. What we are witnessing is the move toward an era of automated industrial slaughter, where the infinite value of human life—created in the image of God—is trampled on the altar of tactical efficiency. Christian civilization has always maintained that true peace is the work of justice and love of neighbor, never the result of a mathematical and sterile annihilation. Allowing machines to decide who lives and who dies is crossing a definitive red line into absolute barbarism; It is abandoning our humanity to become mere administrators of a technological hell. *Legal Note: This critical analysis is carried out under the protection of Art. 28 (news of general interest) and Art. 10 (right of citation) of Law 11,723 on Intellectual Property of the Argentine Republic. The original work and its title belong to its respective author and publication medium, cited on this page.*